THERMOHAMMER Get the app

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs iPad (A16)

Android

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

33.5%speed held · 30 min · 1 thread
VS
iOS

iPad (A16)

85.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

iPad (A16) holds its speed better under sustained load

33.5% against 85.4% of full speed · different test settings, see below

Under sustained load

iPad (A16) keeps 85.4% of its speed, Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 33.5%. The runs used different settings (30 min · 1 thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 33.5% iPad (A16) 85.4%
Throughput over time: Google Pixel 9 Pro XL against iPad (A16)25%50%75%100%0:0010:0020:0030:00Throughput over time: Google Pixel 9 Pro XL against iPad (A16)25%50%75%100%0:0010:0020:0030:00
Google Pixel 9 Pro XLMeasureiPad (A16)
30 min · 1 threadTest5 min · multi-thread
0.51 GIPSFastest sample1.61 GIPS
0.15 GIPSSecond-half average1.38 GIPS
18%Lowest 5-second average82%
SeriousHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

Google Pixel 9 Pro XLMeasureiPad (A16)
AndroidPlatformiOS
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 17OSiOS 26.6

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL iPad (A16)

More matchups

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5% vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5% Google Pixel 9 Pro XL holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5% vs iPhone 13 mini73.0% iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5% vs iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7% iPhone 17 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5% vs iPad (9th generation)76.9% iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPad (A16)85.4% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store