Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs motorola edge 60
Android
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
33.5%speed held · 30 min · 1 threadVS
Android
motorola edge 60
95.1%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadmotorola edge 60 holds its speed better under sustained load
33.5% against 95.1% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
motorola edge 60 keeps 95.1% of its speed, Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 33.5%. The runs used different settings (30 min · 1 thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Measure | motorola edge 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 30 min · 1 thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 0.51 GIPS | Fastest sample | 4.42 GIPS |
| 0.15 GIPS | Second-half average | 4.20 GIPS |
| 18% | Lowest 5-second average | 92% |
| Serious | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Measure | motorola edge 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| Android 17 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
iPhone 17 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 1394.7%
vs
motorola edge 6095.1%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 1291.0%
vs
motorola edge 6095.1%
motorola edge 60 holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.