HONOR X7b vs iPad (9th generation)
Android
HONOR X7b
84.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
iOS
iPad (9th generation)
76.9%speed held · 15 min · multi-threadHONOR X7b holds its speed better under sustained load
84.9% against 76.9% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
HONOR X7b keeps 84.9% of its speed, iPad (9th generation) 76.9%. The runs used different settings (5 min · multi-thread against 15 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| HONOR X7b | Measure | iPad (9th generation) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 15 min · multi-thread |
| 0.42 GIPS | Fastest sample | 1.15 GIPS |
| 0.37 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.88 GIPS |
| 61% | Lowest 5-second average | 45% |
| Nominal | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| HONOR X7b | Measure | iPad (9th generation) |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | iOS |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| Android 14 | OS | iOS 27.2 |
More matchups
HONOR X7b84.9%
vs
iPad mini (5th generation)84.6%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
HONOR X7b84.9%
vs
iPad (A16)85.4%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
HONOR X7b84.9%
vs
iPhone 12 Pro Max84.4%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
HONOR X7b84.9%
vs
iPhone 16 Pro85.5%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.