iPad (A16) vs iPhone 13 mini
iOS
iPad (A16)
85.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
iOS
iPhone 13 mini
73.0%speed held · 15 min · multi-threadiPad (A16) holds its speed better under sustained load
85.4% against 73.0% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
iPad (A16) keeps 85.4% of its speed, iPhone 13 mini 73.0%. The runs used different settings (5 min · multi-thread against 15 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPad (A16) | Measure | iPhone 13 mini |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 15 min · multi-thread |
| 1.61 GIPS | Fastest sample | 1.73 GIPS |
| 1.38 GIPS | Second-half average | 1.26 GIPS |
| 82% | Lowest 5-second average | 68% |
| Nominal | Hottest state reported | Serious |
The devices
| iPad (A16) | Measure | iPhone 13 mini |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | iOS |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 26.6 | OS | iOS 26.6.1 |
More matchups
iPad (A16)85.4%
vs
iPhone 16 Pro85.5%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
HONOR X7b84.9%
vs
iPad (A16)85.4%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad (A16)85.4%
vs
iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad (A16)85.4%
vs
iPad mini (5th generation)84.6%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
vs
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
iPhone 17 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.