THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPad (A16) vs iPhone SE (2nd Gen)

iOS

iPad (A16)

85.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
iOS

iPhone SE (2nd Gen)

84.1%speed held · 30 min · multi-thread

iPad (A16) holds its speed better under sustained load

85.4% against 84.1% of full speed · different test settings, see below

Under sustained load

iPad (A16) keeps 85.4% of its speed, iPhone SE (2nd Gen) 84.1%. The runs used different settings (5 min · multi-thread against 30 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPad (A16) 85.4% iPhone SE (2nd Gen) 84.1%
Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against iPhone SE (2nd Gen)25%50%75%100%0:0010:0020:0030:00Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against iPhone SE (2nd Gen)25%50%75%100%0:0010:0020:0030:00
iPad (A16)MeasureiPhone SE (2nd Gen)
5 min · multi-threadTest30 min · multi-thread
1.61 GIPSFastest sample0.81 GIPS
1.38 GIPSSecond-half average0.68 GIPS
82%Lowest 5-second average35%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPad (A16)MeasureiPhone SE (2nd Gen)
iOSPlatformiOS
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.6OSiOS 26.6

iPad (A16) iPhone SE (2nd Gen)

More matchups

iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPad (A16)85.4% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (9th generation)76.9% vs iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1% iPhone SE (2nd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation)92.2% vs iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1% iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store