iPad (A16) vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
iOS
iPad (A16)
85.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
7.5%speed held · 5 min · 1 threadiPad (A16) holds its speed better under sustained load
85.4% against 7.5% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
iPad (A16) keeps 85.4% of its speed, Nothing Phone (3a) Lite 7.5%. The runs used different settings (5 min · multi-thread against 5 min · 1 thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPad (A16) | Measure | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · 1 thread |
| 1.61 GIPS | Fastest sample | 2.86 GIPS |
| 1.38 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.21 GIPS |
| 82% | Lowest 5-second average | 3% |
| Nominal | Hottest state reported | Serious |
The devices
| iPad (A16) | Measure | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 26.6 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
iPad (A16)85.4%
vs
iPhone 16 Pro85.5%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
HONOR X7b84.9%
vs
iPad (A16)85.4%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad (A16)85.4%
vs
iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad (A16)85.4%
vs
iPad mini (5th generation)84.6%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.