THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPad (A16) vs Xiaomi Mi 10T

iOS

iPad (A16)

85.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Mi 10T

77.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

iPad (A16) holds its speed better under sustained load

85.4% against 77.9% of full speed

Under sustained load

iPad (A16) keeps 85.4% of its speed, Xiaomi Mi 10T 77.9%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPad (A16) 85.4% Xiaomi Mi 10T 77.9%
Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against Xiaomi Mi 10T25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against Xiaomi Mi 10T25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPad (A16)MeasureXiaomi Mi 10T
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.61 GIPSFastest sample1.07 GIPS
1.38 GIPSSecond-half average0.85 GIPS
82%Lowest 5-second average68%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPad (A16)MeasureXiaomi Mi 10T
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.6OSAndroid 12

iPad (A16) Xiaomi Mi 10T

More matchups

iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPad (A16)85.4% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 12 mini78.0% vs Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 1177.5% vs Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store