iPhone 16 Pro vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
iOS
iPhone 16 Pro
85.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
7.5%speed held · 5 min · 1 threadiPhone 16 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
85.5% against 7.5% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
iPhone 16 Pro keeps 85.5% of its speed, Nothing Phone (3a) Lite 7.5%. The runs used different settings (5 min · multi-thread against 5 min · 1 thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone 16 Pro | Measure | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · 1 thread |
| 2.23 GIPS | Fastest sample | 2.86 GIPS |
| 1.91 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.21 GIPS |
| 80% | Lowest 5-second average | 3% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Serious |
The devices
| iPhone 16 Pro | Measure | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 27.0 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
iPad (A16)85.4%
vs
iPhone 16 Pro85.5%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
HONOR X7b84.9%
vs
iPhone 16 Pro85.5%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2%
vs
iPhone 16 Pro85.5%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (5th generation)84.6%
vs
iPhone 16 Pro85.5%
iPhone 16 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.