iPhone 16 Pro vs Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G
iOS
iPhone 16 Pro
85.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G
82.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadiPhone 16 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
85.5% against 82.3% of full speed
Under sustained load
iPhone 16 Pro keeps 85.5% of its speed, Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G 82.3%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone 16 Pro | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 2.23 GIPS | Fastest sample | 1.18 GIPS |
| 1.91 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.97 GIPS |
| 80% | Lowest 5-second average | 79% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| iPhone 16 Pro | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 27.0 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
iPad (A16)85.4%
vs
iPhone 16 Pro85.5%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
HONOR X7b84.9%
vs
iPhone 16 Pro85.5%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2%
vs
iPhone 16 Pro85.5%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (5th generation)84.6%
vs
iPhone 16 Pro85.5%
iPhone 16 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 15 Pro Max82.5%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G82.3%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 14 Pro81.3%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G82.3%
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.