iPhone 16 vs Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G
iOS
iPhone 16
79.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G
82.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadXiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G holds its speed better under sustained load
79.9% against 82.3% of full speed
Under sustained load
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G keeps 82.3% of its speed, iPhone 16 79.9%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone 16 | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 2.17 GIPS | Fastest sample | 1.18 GIPS |
| 1.73 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.97 GIPS |
| 79% | Lowest 5-second average | 79% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| iPhone 16 | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 27.0 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
iPhone 1679.9%
vs
iPhone XR79.8%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 1480.1%
vs
iPhone 1679.9%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 14 Pro Max80.8%
vs
iPhone 1679.9%
iPhone 14 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation)80.9%
vs
iPhone 1679.9%
iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 15 Pro Max82.5%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G82.3%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 14 Pro81.3%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G82.3%
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.