Nothing Phone (3a) Lite vs Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G
Android
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
7.5%speed held · 5 min · 1 threadVS
Android
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G
82.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadXiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G holds its speed better under sustained load
7.5% against 82.3% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G keeps 82.3% of its speed, Nothing Phone (3a) Lite 7.5%. The runs used different settings (5 min · 1 thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| Nothing Phone (3a) Lite | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · 1 thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 2.86 GIPS | Fastest sample | 1.18 GIPS |
| 0.21 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.97 GIPS |
| 3% | Lowest 5-second average | 79% |
| Serious | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| Nothing Phone (3a) Lite | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| Android 16 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
iPhone 17 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 15 Pro Max82.5%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G82.3%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 14 Pro81.3%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G82.3%
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.