Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs iPhone 16e
Android
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
33.5%speed held · 30 min · 1 threadVS
iOS
iPhone 16e
73.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadiPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load
33.5% against 73.5% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
iPhone 16e keeps 73.5% of its speed, Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 33.5%. The runs used different settings (30 min · 1 thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Measure | iPhone 16e |
|---|---|---|
| 30 min · 1 thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 0.51 GIPS | Fastest sample | 2.00 GIPS |
| 0.15 GIPS | Second-half average | 1.47 GIPS |
| 18% | Lowest 5-second average | 72% |
| Serious | Hottest state reported | Fair |
The devices
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Measure | iPhone 16e |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | iOS |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| Android 17 | OS | iOS 26.6.1 |
More matchups
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
iPhone 17 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 572.5%
vs
iPhone 16e73.5%
iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.