THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 16e vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)

iOS

iPhone 16e

73.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
iOS

iPhone SE (3rd Gen)

74.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load

73.5% against 74.3% of full speed

Under sustained load

iPhone SE (3rd Gen) keeps 74.3% of its speed, iPhone 16e 73.5%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 16e 73.5% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) 74.3%
Throughput over time: iPhone 16e against iPhone SE (3rd Gen)25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 16e against iPhone SE (3rd Gen)25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 16eMeasureiPhone SE (3rd Gen)
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
2.00 GIPSFastest sample1.56 GIPS
1.47 GIPSSecond-half average1.16 GIPS
72%Lowest 5-second average73%
FairHottest state reportedFair

The devices

iPhone 16eMeasureiPhone SE (3rd Gen)
iOSPlatformiOS
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.6.1OSiOS 27.0

iPhone 16e iPhone SE (3rd Gen)

More matchups

Google Pixel 572.5% vs iPhone 16e73.5% iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 16e73.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1577.3% vs iPhone 16e73.5% iPhone 15 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well Google Pixel 572.5% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1577.3% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone 15 holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store