THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone SE (3rd Gen) vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

iOS

iPhone SE (3rd Gen)

74.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

74.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

74.3% against 74.7% of full speed

Under sustained load

Both hold their speed about equally: 74.3% and 74.7%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone SE (3rd Gen) 74.3% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro 74.7%
Throughput over time: iPhone SE (3rd Gen) against Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone SE (3rd Gen) against Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)MeasureXiaomi POCO X7 Pro
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.56 GIPSFastest sample0.81 GIPS
1.16 GIPSSecond-half average0.60 GIPS
73%Lowest 5-second average56%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone SE (3rd Gen)MeasureXiaomi POCO X7 Pro
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 27.0OSAndroid 16

iPhone SE (3rd Gen) Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

More matchups

iPhone 16e73.5% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 572.5% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1577.3% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone 15 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 16e73.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 572.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1577.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% iPhone 15 holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store