THERMOHAMMER Get the app
Android

Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

OSAndroid 16

Speed held under load 74.7% #26 of 34 · 5 min · multi-thread

Under sustained load

Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds 74.7% of its peak speed through a 5-minute stress test on every core. That is #26 of 34 devices on the same test.

Throughput ribbonrun #1032 · Android 16
Held
74.7% of full speed
Peak
0.81 GIPS
Second half
0.60 GIPS
Test
5 min every core
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro: throughput over a 5-minute stress test25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro: throughput over a 5-minute stress test25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
Speed as a share of the run's fastest sample.
Fastest sample
0.81 GIPS
Second-half average
0.60 GIPS
Lowest 5-second average
56%
First under 90%
0:05 into the run
Hottest state reported
Nominal
Samples
299
All 3 stress runsbest first
RunTestOSCurvePeak GIPSSecond halfStability
#1033 5 min · 1 thread 16 0.39 0.37 94.7%
#1032 5 min · multi-thread 16 0.81 0.60 74.7%
#1034 5 min · multi-thread 16 0.69 0.51 73.7%

Compare it

The closest devices on the board, head to head.

iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 16e73.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 572.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1577.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% iPhone 15 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1177.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% iPhone 11 holds its speed better under sustained load Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Xiaomi Mi 10T holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare with any device

Have a Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro?

Run it yourself and see how your unit compares with this one. Clean runs join the board.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store