Xiaomi Mi 10T vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro
Android
Xiaomi Mi 10T
77.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro
74.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadXiaomi Mi 10T holds its speed better under sustained load
77.9% against 74.7% of full speed
Under sustained load
Xiaomi Mi 10T keeps 77.9% of its speed, Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro 74.7%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| Xiaomi Mi 10T | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 1.07 GIPS | Fastest sample | 0.81 GIPS |
| 0.85 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.60 GIPS |
| 68% | Lowest 5-second average | 56% |
| Nominal | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| Xiaomi Mi 10T | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| Android 12 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
iPhone 12 mini78.0%
vs
Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 1177.5%
vs
Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 1577.3%
vs
Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone XR79.8%
vs
Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9%
iPhone XR holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.