THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 16e vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

iOS

iPhone 16e

73.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

74.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load

73.5% against 74.7% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro keeps 74.7% of its speed, iPhone 16e 73.5%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 16e 73.5% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro 74.7%
Throughput over time: iPhone 16e against Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 16e against Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 16eMeasureXiaomi POCO X7 Pro
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
2.00 GIPSFastest sample0.81 GIPS
1.47 GIPSSecond-half average0.60 GIPS
72%Lowest 5-second average56%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 16eMeasureXiaomi POCO X7 Pro
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.6.1OSAndroid 16

iPhone 16e Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

More matchups

iPhone 16e73.5% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 572.5% vs iPhone 16e73.5% iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1577.3% vs iPhone 16e73.5% iPhone 15 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well Google Pixel 572.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1577.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% iPhone 15 holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store