THERMOHAMMER Get the app

Google Pixel 9 vs iPhone 13 mini

Android

Google Pixel 9

68.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
iOS

iPhone 13 mini

73.0%speed held · 15 min · multi-thread

iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load

68.6% against 73.0% of full speed · different test settings, see below

Under sustained load

iPhone 13 mini keeps 73.0% of its speed, Google Pixel 9 68.6%. The runs used different settings (5 min · multi-thread against 15 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
Google Pixel 9 68.6% iPhone 13 mini 73.0%
Throughput over time: Google Pixel 9 against iPhone 13 mini25%50%75%100%0:005:0010:0015:00Throughput over time: Google Pixel 9 against iPhone 13 mini25%50%75%100%0:005:0010:0015:00
Google Pixel 9MeasureiPhone 13 mini
5 min · multi-threadTest15 min · multi-thread
0.85 GIPSFastest sample1.73 GIPS
0.58 GIPSSecond-half average1.26 GIPS
58%Lowest 5-second average68%
FairHottest state reportedSerious

The devices

Google Pixel 9MeasureiPhone 13 mini
AndroidPlatformiOS
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 17OSiOS 26.6.1

Google Pixel 9 iPhone 13 mini

More matchups

Google Pixel 968.6% vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well Google Pixel 572.5% vs Google Pixel 968.6% Google Pixel 5 holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 968.6% vs iPhone 16e73.5% iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 968.6% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 13 mini73.0% vs iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7% iPhone 17 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load iPad (9th generation)76.9% vs iPhone 13 mini73.0% iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store