THERMOHAMMER Get the app

Google Pixel 9 vs iPhone 16e

Android

Google Pixel 9

68.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
iOS

iPhone 16e

73.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load

68.6% against 73.5% of full speed

Under sustained load

iPhone 16e keeps 73.5% of its speed, Google Pixel 9 68.6%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
Google Pixel 9 68.6% iPhone 16e 73.5%
Throughput over time: Google Pixel 9 against iPhone 16e25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: Google Pixel 9 against iPhone 16e25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
Google Pixel 9MeasureiPhone 16e
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
0.85 GIPSFastest sample2.00 GIPS
0.58 GIPSSecond-half average1.47 GIPS
58%Lowest 5-second average72%
FairHottest state reportedFair

The devices

Google Pixel 9MeasureiPhone 16e
AndroidPlatformiOS
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 17OSiOS 26.6.1

Google Pixel 9 iPhone 16e

More matchups

Google Pixel 968.6% vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well Google Pixel 572.5% vs Google Pixel 968.6% Google Pixel 5 holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 968.6% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 16e73.5% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 572.5% vs iPhone 16e73.5% iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 16e73.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store