Google Pixel 9 vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
Android
Google Pixel 9
68.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
7.5%speed held · 5 min · 1 threadGoogle Pixel 9 holds its speed better under sustained load
68.6% against 7.5% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 keeps 68.6% of its speed, Nothing Phone (3a) Lite 7.5%. The runs used different settings (5 min · multi-thread against 5 min · 1 thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| Google Pixel 9 | Measure | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · 1 thread |
| 0.85 GIPS | Fastest sample | 2.86 GIPS |
| 0.58 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.21 GIPS |
| 58% | Lowest 5-second average | 3% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Serious |
The devices
| Google Pixel 9 | Measure | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| Android 17 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
Google Pixel 572.5%
vs
Google Pixel 968.6%
Google Pixel 5 holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
iPhone 16e73.5%
iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.