THERMOHAMMER Get the app

HONOR 90 vs iPad (A16)

Android

HONOR 90

49.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
iOS

iPad (A16)

85.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

iPad (A16) holds its speed better under sustained load

49.2% against 85.4% of full speed

Under sustained load

iPad (A16) keeps 85.4% of its speed, HONOR 90 49.2%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
HONOR 90 49.2% iPad (A16) 85.4%
Throughput over time: HONOR 90 against iPad (A16)25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: HONOR 90 against iPad (A16)25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
HONOR 90MeasureiPad (A16)
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
4.32 GIPSFastest sample1.61 GIPS
2.12 GIPSSecond-half average1.38 GIPS
39%Lowest 5-second average82%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

HONOR 90MeasureiPad (A16)
AndroidPlatformiOS
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 15OSiOS 26.6

HONOR 90 iPad (A16)

More matchups

HONOR 9049.2% vs iPhone 11 Pro55.7% iPhone 11 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load HONOR 600 Pro56.4% vs HONOR 9049.2% HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 968.6% vs HONOR 9049.2% Google Pixel 9 holds its speed better under sustained load HONOR 9049.2% vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2% Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) holds its speed better under sustained load iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPad (A16)85.4% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store