HONOR 90 vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
Android
HONOR 90
49.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) · Mali-G1-Ultra MC12
69.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) holds its speed better under sustained load
49.2% against 69.2% of full speed
Under sustained load
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) keeps 69.2% of its speed, HONOR 90 49.2%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| HONOR 90 | Measure | Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 4.32 GIPS | Fastest sample | 1.44 GIPS |
| 2.12 GIPS | Second-half average | 1.08 GIPS |
| 39% | Lowest 5-second average | 63% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Serious |
The devices
| HONOR 90 | Measure | Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) |
| – | GPU | Mali-G1-Ultra MC12 |
| Android 15 | OS | Android 17 |
More matchups
HONOR 9049.2%
vs
iPhone 11 Pro55.7%
iPhone 11 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
HONOR 600 Pro56.4%
vs
HONOR 9049.2%
HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
HONOR 9049.2%
Google Pixel 9 holds its speed better under sustained load
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 18% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
HONOR 600 Pro scores 22% higher overall
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
vs
Xiaomi 17T23,022
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 75% higher overall
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.