THERMOHAMMER Get the app

Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) vs Xiaomi 17T

Android

Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)

Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) · Mali-G1-Ultra MC12

40,322total score
VS
Android

Xiaomi 17T

MT6899 · Mali-G720 MC8

23,022total score

Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 75% higher overall

Ahead in 6 of 6 sections

Section by sectioneach axis scaled to the better device
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) Xiaomi 17T
Section by section: Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) against Xiaomi 17TCPU+62%MEM+42%GPU+64%UX+155%AI+87%LLM+77%
8,610+62% CPUVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) leads 5,325

7,759Math4,591

1,900 ops/sThroughput1,124 ops/s

9,949JSON & XML6,688

1,073 ops/sThroughput721 ops/s

7,133Compression & crypto5,711

690 ops/sThroughput552 ops/s

9,980Multi-core4,585

8,322 ops/sThroughput3,823 ops/s
9,839+42% MemoryVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) leads 6,922

8,355RAM5,028

51.1 GB/sRead41.4 GB/s
52.6 GB/sWrite16.7 GB/s
27.1 GB/sCopy16.7 GB/s
155 nsLatency187 ns

6,719Storage7,595

1,708 MB/sSequential read2,982 MB/s
1,332 MB/sSequential write1,667 MB/s
45,475 IOPSRandom read (4 KB)39,603 IOPS
13,433 IOPSRandom write (4 KB)11,531 IOPS
direct I/OReadsdirect I/O

16,968Database8,686

27,449 tx/sInsert16,142 tx/s
182,899 tx/sUpdate82,898 tx/s
31,932 /sQuery16,072 /s
5,978+64% GPUVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) leads 3,656

2,765Lake Valley2,537

59.7 fpsAverage54.8 fps
52.4 fps1% low41.7 fps

4,758Neon City2,978

20.9 fpsAverage13.1 fps
17.5 fps1% low7.7 fps

10,680Neon City RT5,470

23.8 fpsAverage12.2 fps
19.6 fps1% low9.2 fps
10,050+155% Everyday UXVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) leads 3,938

6,751Web browsing4,123

5,290Layout3,673
2,887Canvas1,720
612CSS340
2,721SVG1,470
3,419 ops/sJavaScript2,338 ops/s

64,156Web scrolling4,997

712,129 px/sSpeed held55,465 px/s
0.0 %Frames dropped3.7 %

8,428Photo gallery5,200

140 MP/sJPEG113 MP/s
125 MP/sWebP87.2 MP/s
186 MP/sAVIF81.7 MP/s

4,759Photo editing3,261

315 MP/sEditing chain216 MP/s

6,655Video playback2,707

320 fps · hardware4K60 H.264174 fps · hardware
358 fps · hardware4K60 HEVC195 fps · hardware
323 fps · hardware4K60 VP9184 fps · hardware
279 fps · hardware4K60 AV1164 fps · hardware
104 fps · hardware8K30 HEVCnot supported
77.3 fps · hardware8K30 AV1not supported

11,348Video export2,849

225 fps · 40.0 dB · hardware4K60 H.26493.3 fps · 39.3 dB · hardware
280 fps · 42.5 dB · hardware4K60 HEVC96.7 fps · 42.0 dB · hardware
no encoder4K60 AV1no encoder
75.3 fps · 46.7 dB · hardware8K30 HEVCno encoder

7,825QR scanning5,170

733 scans/sZXing485 scans/s
91.4 scans/sML Kit66.8 scans/s
3,933+87% AIVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) leads 2,103

7,803CPU4,838

398 inferences/sClassify243 inferences/s
25.2 inferences/sDetect13.5 inferences/s
8.24 inferences/sSegment4.44 inferences/s
3.42 inferences/sUpscale2.51 inferences/s
57.6 inferences/sDepth30.6 inferences/s
2,305 inferences/sSound2,137 inferences/s

1,556GPU1,471

115 inferences/sClassify99.9 inferences/s
25.7 inferences/sDetect23.5 inferences/s
11.0 inferences/sSegment10.8 inferences/s
32.6 inferences/sUpscale27.8 inferences/s
38.8 inferences/sDepth53.2 inferences/s
271 inferences/sSound184 inferences/s

2,440NPU0

MediaTek NeuroPilotRuntimenone ran
994 inferences/sClassify—
76.5 inferences/sDetect—
91.3 inferences/sSegment—
252 inferences/sUpscale—
369 inferences/sDepth—
1,248 inferences/sSound—
1,912+77% LLMVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) leads 1,078

630Prompt (prefill)294

38.1 tok/sCPU17.8 tok/s
23.1 tok/sGPU5.0 tok/s

5,802Reply (decode)3,956

16.7 tok/sCPU11.4 tok/s
13.6 tok/sGPU6.9 tok/s

Run

Mali-G1-Ultra MC12GPU usedMali-G720 MC8
8.3 GBFree memory at start5.3 GB

Open a section for every test. Scores within 1% count as even.

The devices

Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)MeasureXiaomi 17T
AndroidPlatformAndroid
Dimensity 9500 (MT6993)ChipMT6899
Mali-G1-Ultra MC12GPUMali-G720 MC8
Android 17OSAndroid 17
1Verified benchmark runs1
10 Nov 2026Best run11 Nov 2026

Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) Xiaomi 17T

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store