Android
Xiaomi 17T
Total score
23,022
#5 of 5 on the board · #4 on Android
Six sectionsdashed: the 6,000 reference
Against the referencebest verified run
6,000 points: a Snapdragon 8 Elite phone, as it ships
Strongest: Memory at 1.15× the reference. Weakest: LLM at 0.18×.
- Verified runs
- 1
- Against the reference
- 0.64× of 36,000
- Best run
- 11 Nov 2026
- App version
- 2.0.4
Every test of the best run
The raw measurements behind the score, as the server recorded them.
CPU5,325
Math4,591
- Throughput
- 1,124 ops/s
JSON & XML6,688
- Throughput
- 721 ops/s
Compression & crypto5,711
- Throughput
- 552 ops/s
Multi-core4,585
- Throughput
- 3,823 ops/s
Memory6,922
RAM5,028
- Read
- 41.4 GB/s
- Write
- 16.7 GB/s
- Copy
- 16.7 GB/s
- Latency
- 187 ns
Storage7,595
- Sequential read
- 2,982 MB/s
- Sequential write
- 1,667 MB/s
- Random read (4 KB)
- 39,603 IOPS
- Random write (4 KB)
- 11,531 IOPS
- Reads
- direct I/O
Database8,686
- Insert
- 16,142 tx/s
- Update
- 82,898 tx/s
- Query
- 16,072 /s
GPU3,656
Lake Valley2,537
- Average
- 54.8 fps
- 1% low
- 41.7 fps
Neon City2,978
- Average
- 13.1 fps
- 1% low
- 7.7 fps
Neon City RT5,470
- Average
- 12.2 fps
- 1% low
- 9.2 fps
Everyday UX3,938
Web browsing4,123
- Layout
- 3,673
- Canvas
- 1,720
- CSS
- 340
- SVG
- 1,470
- JavaScript
- 2,338 ops/s
Web scrolling4,997
- Speed held
- 55,465 px/s
- Frames dropped
- 3.7 %
Photo gallery5,200
- JPEG
- 113 MP/s
- WebP
- 87.2 MP/s
- AVIF
- 81.7 MP/s
Photo editing3,261
- Editing chain
- 216 MP/s
Video playback2,707
- 4K60 H.264
- 174 fps · hardware
- 4K60 HEVC
- 195 fps · hardware
- 4K60 VP9
- 184 fps · hardware
- 4K60 AV1
- 164 fps · hardware
- 8K30 HEVC
- not supported
- 8K30 AV1
- not supported
Video export2,849
- 4K60 H.264
- 93.3 fps · 39.3 dB · hardware
- 4K60 HEVC
- 96.7 fps · 42.0 dB · hardware
- 4K60 AV1
- no encoder
- 8K30 HEVC
- no encoder
QR scanning5,170
- ZXing
- 485 scans/s
- ML Kit
- 66.8 scans/s
AI2,103
CPU4,838
- Classify
- 243 inferences/s
- Detect
- 13.5 inferences/s
- Segment
- 4.44 inferences/s
- Upscale
- 2.51 inferences/s
- Depth
- 30.6 inferences/s
- Sound
- 2,137 inferences/s
GPU1,471
- Classify
- 99.9 inferences/s
- Detect
- 23.5 inferences/s
- Segment
- 10.8 inferences/s
- Upscale
- 27.8 inferences/s
- Depth
- 53.2 inferences/s
- Sound
- 184 inferences/s
NPU0
- Runtime
- none ran
- Classify
- —
- Detect
- —
- Segment
- —
- Upscale
- —
- Depth
- —
- Sound
- —
LLM1,078
Prompt (prefill)294
- CPU
- 17.8 tok/s
- GPU
- 5.0 tok/s
Reply (decode)3,956
- CPU
- 11.4 tok/s
- GPU
- 6.9 tok/s
Run
- GPU used
- Mali-G720 MC8
- Free memory at start
- 5.3 GB
No stress run yet. Nobody has submitted a sustained-load run for this device, so we don't know how well it holds its speed.
Compare it
The closest devices on the board, head to head.
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
vs
Xiaomi 17T23,022
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE scores 48% higher overall
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
vs
Xiaomi 17T23,022
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 75% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Xiaomi 17T23,022
HONOR 600 Pro scores 113% higher overall
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF)134,594
vs
Xiaomi 17T23,022
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF) scores 485% higher overall
Have a Xiaomi 17T?
Run it yourself and see how your unit compares with this one. Clean runs join the board.