Samsung Galaxy S25 FE scores 48% higher overall
Ahead in 6 of 6 sections
Section by sectioneach axis scaled to the better device
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xiaomi 17T
8,781+65%
CPUSamsung Galaxy S25 FE leads
5,325
8,110Math4,591
| 1,986 ops/s | Throughput | 1,124 ops/s |
11,621JSON & XML6,688
| 1,253 ops/s | Throughput | 721 ops/s |
8,294Compression & crypto5,711
| 802 ops/s | Throughput | 552 ops/s |
7,607Multi-core4,585
| 6,343 ops/s | Throughput | 3,823 ops/s |
8,844+28%
MemorySamsung Galaxy S25 FE leads
6,922
7,397RAM5,028
| 42.1 GB/s | Read | 41.4 GB/s |
| 46.5 GB/s | Write | 16.7 GB/s |
| 19.0 GB/s | Copy | 16.7 GB/s |
| 129 ns | Latency | 187 ns |
6,084Storage7,595
| 1,618 MB/s | Sequential read | 2,982 MB/s |
| 905 MB/s | Sequential write | 1,667 MB/s |
| 42,623 IOPS | Random read (4 KB) | 39,603 IOPS |
| 14,973 IOPS | Random write (4 KB) | 11,531 IOPS |
| direct I/O | Reads | direct I/O |
15,371Database8,686
| 23,215 tx/s | Insert | 16,142 tx/s |
| 166,233 tx/s | Update | 82,898 tx/s |
| 30,885 /s | Query | 16,072 /s |
4,532+24%
GPUSamsung Galaxy S25 FE leads
3,656
2,939Lake Valley2,537
| 63.5 fps | Average | 54.8 fps |
| 58.7 fps | 1% low | 41.7 fps |
3,928Neon City2,978
| 17.2 fps | Average | 13.1 fps |
| 14.7 fps | 1% low | 7.7 fps |
6,801Neon City RT5,470
| 15.2 fps | Average | 12.2 fps |
| 11.7 fps | 1% low | 9.2 fps |
7,143+81%
Everyday UXSamsung Galaxy S25 FE leads
3,938
9,333Web browsing4,123
| 6,612 | Layout | 3,673 |
| 3,359 | Canvas | 1,720 |
| 1,102 | CSS | 340 |
| 5,020 | SVG | 1,470 |
| 3,574 ops/s | JavaScript | 2,338 ops/s |
76,987Web scrolling4,997
| 854,555 px/s | Speed held | 55,465 px/s |
| 0.6 % | Frames dropped | 3.7 % |
9,347Photo gallery5,200
| 204 MP/s | JPEG | 113 MP/s |
| 151 MP/s | WebP | 87.2 MP/s |
| 152 MP/s | AVIF | 81.7 MP/s |
3,319Photo editing3,261
| 220 MP/s | Editing chain | 216 MP/s |
3,733Video playback2,707
| 185 fps · hardware | 4K60 H.264 | 174 fps · hardware |
| 193 fps · hardware | 4K60 HEVC | 195 fps · hardware |
| 235 fps · hardware | 4K60 VP9 | 184 fps · hardware |
| 164 fps · hardware | 4K60 AV1 | 164 fps · hardware |
| 79.1 fps · hardware | 8K30 HEVC | not supported |
| not supported | 8K30 AV1 | not supported |
3,501Video export2,849
| 110 fps · 38.9 dB · hardware | 4K60 H.264 | 93.3 fps · 39.3 dB · hardware |
| 123 fps · 44.0 dB · hardware | 4K60 HEVC | 96.7 fps · 42.0 dB · hardware |
| no encoder | 4K60 AV1 | no encoder |
| no encoder | 8K30 HEVC | no encoder |
2,603QR scanning5,170
| 244 scans/s | ZXing | 485 scans/s |
| 91.3 scans/s | ML Kit | 66.8 scans/s |
2,726+30%
AISamsung Galaxy S25 FE leads
2,103
7,069CPU4,838
| 370 inferences/s | Classify | 243 inferences/s |
| 18.5 inferences/s | Detect | 13.5 inferences/s |
| 5.74 inferences/s | Segment | 4.44 inferences/s |
| 3.57 inferences/s | Upscale | 2.51 inferences/s |
| 53.5 inferences/s | Depth | 30.6 inferences/s |
| 3,152 inferences/s | Sound | 2,137 inferences/s |
1,110GPU1,471
| 132 inferences/s | Classify | 99.9 inferences/s |
| 15.6 inferences/s | Detect | 23.5 inferences/s |
| 4.29 inferences/s | Segment | 10.8 inferences/s |
| 10.3 inferences/s | Upscale | 27.8 inferences/s |
| 34.5 inferences/s | Depth | 53.2 inferences/s |
| 437 inferences/s | Sound | 184 inferences/s |
0NPU0
| none ran | Runtime | none ran |
| — | Classify | — |
| — | Detect | — |
| — | Segment | — |
| — | Upscale | — |
| — | Depth | — |
| — | Sound | — |
2,106+95%
LLMSamsung Galaxy S25 FE leads
1,078
1,132Prompt (prefill)294
| 26.4 tok/s | CPU | 17.8 tok/s |
| 68.4 tok/s | GPU | 5.0 tok/s |
3,918Reply (decode)3,956
| 11.2 tok/s | CPU | 11.4 tok/s |
| 6.2 tok/s | GPU | 6.9 tok/s |
Run
| Samsung Xclipse 940 | GPU used | Mali-G720 MC8 |
| 2.4 GB | Free memory at start | 5.3 GB |
Open a section for every test. Scores within 1% count as even.
The devices
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | Measure | Xiaomi 17T |
| Android | Platform | Android |
| Exynos 2400 (s5e9945) | Chip | MT6899 |
| Samsung Xclipse 940 | GPU | Mali-G720 MC8 |
| Android 17 | OS | Android 17 |
| 1 | Verified benchmark runs | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | Best run | 11 Nov 2026 |
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xiaomi 17T
More matchups
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 18% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
HONOR 600 Pro scores 44% higher overall
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF)134,594
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF) scores 294% higher overall
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
vs
Xiaomi 17T23,022
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 75% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Xiaomi 17T23,022
HONOR 600 Pro scores 113% higher overall
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF)134,594
vs
Xiaomi 17T23,022
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF) scores 485% higher overall
Compare any two devices