THERMOHAMMER Get the app

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs Xiaomi 17T

Android

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

Exynos 2400 (s5e9945) · Samsung Xclipse 940

34,132total score
VS
Android

Xiaomi 17T

MT6899 · Mali-G720 MC8

23,022total score

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE scores 48% higher overall

Ahead in 6 of 6 sections

Section by sectioneach axis scaled to the better device
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xiaomi 17T
Section by section: Samsung Galaxy S25 FE against Xiaomi 17TCPU+65%MEM+28%GPU+24%UX+81%AI+30%LLM+95%
8,781+65% CPUSamsung Galaxy S25 FE leads 5,325

8,110Math4,591

1,986 ops/sThroughput1,124 ops/s

11,621JSON & XML6,688

1,253 ops/sThroughput721 ops/s

8,294Compression & crypto5,711

802 ops/sThroughput552 ops/s

7,607Multi-core4,585

6,343 ops/sThroughput3,823 ops/s
8,844+28% MemorySamsung Galaxy S25 FE leads 6,922

7,397RAM5,028

42.1 GB/sRead41.4 GB/s
46.5 GB/sWrite16.7 GB/s
19.0 GB/sCopy16.7 GB/s
129 nsLatency187 ns

6,084Storage7,595

1,618 MB/sSequential read2,982 MB/s
905 MB/sSequential write1,667 MB/s
42,623 IOPSRandom read (4 KB)39,603 IOPS
14,973 IOPSRandom write (4 KB)11,531 IOPS
direct I/OReadsdirect I/O

15,371Database8,686

23,215 tx/sInsert16,142 tx/s
166,233 tx/sUpdate82,898 tx/s
30,885 /sQuery16,072 /s
4,532+24% GPUSamsung Galaxy S25 FE leads 3,656

2,939Lake Valley2,537

63.5 fpsAverage54.8 fps
58.7 fps1% low41.7 fps

3,928Neon City2,978

17.2 fpsAverage13.1 fps
14.7 fps1% low7.7 fps

6,801Neon City RT5,470

15.2 fpsAverage12.2 fps
11.7 fps1% low9.2 fps
7,143+81% Everyday UXSamsung Galaxy S25 FE leads 3,938

9,333Web browsing4,123

6,612Layout3,673
3,359Canvas1,720
1,102CSS340
5,020SVG1,470
3,574 ops/sJavaScript2,338 ops/s

76,987Web scrolling4,997

854,555 px/sSpeed held55,465 px/s
0.6 %Frames dropped3.7 %

9,347Photo gallery5,200

204 MP/sJPEG113 MP/s
151 MP/sWebP87.2 MP/s
152 MP/sAVIF81.7 MP/s

3,319Photo editing3,261

220 MP/sEditing chain216 MP/s

3,733Video playback2,707

185 fps · hardware4K60 H.264174 fps · hardware
193 fps · hardware4K60 HEVC195 fps · hardware
235 fps · hardware4K60 VP9184 fps · hardware
164 fps · hardware4K60 AV1164 fps · hardware
79.1 fps · hardware8K30 HEVCnot supported
not supported8K30 AV1not supported

3,501Video export2,849

110 fps · 38.9 dB · hardware4K60 H.26493.3 fps · 39.3 dB · hardware
123 fps · 44.0 dB · hardware4K60 HEVC96.7 fps · 42.0 dB · hardware
no encoder4K60 AV1no encoder
no encoder8K30 HEVCno encoder

2,603QR scanning5,170

244 scans/sZXing485 scans/s
91.3 scans/sML Kit66.8 scans/s
2,726+30% AISamsung Galaxy S25 FE leads 2,103

7,069CPU4,838

370 inferences/sClassify243 inferences/s
18.5 inferences/sDetect13.5 inferences/s
5.74 inferences/sSegment4.44 inferences/s
3.57 inferences/sUpscale2.51 inferences/s
53.5 inferences/sDepth30.6 inferences/s
3,152 inferences/sSound2,137 inferences/s

1,110GPU1,471

132 inferences/sClassify99.9 inferences/s
15.6 inferences/sDetect23.5 inferences/s
4.29 inferences/sSegment10.8 inferences/s
10.3 inferences/sUpscale27.8 inferences/s
34.5 inferences/sDepth53.2 inferences/s
437 inferences/sSound184 inferences/s

0NPU0

none ranRuntimenone ran
—Classify—
—Detect—
—Segment—
—Upscale—
—Depth—
—Sound—
2,106+95% LLMSamsung Galaxy S25 FE leads 1,078

1,132Prompt (prefill)294

26.4 tok/sCPU17.8 tok/s
68.4 tok/sGPU5.0 tok/s

3,918Reply (decode)3,956

11.2 tok/sCPU11.4 tok/s
6.2 tok/sGPU6.9 tok/s

Run

Samsung Xclipse 940GPU usedMali-G720 MC8
2.4 GBFree memory at start5.3 GB

Open a section for every test. Scores within 1% count as even.

The devices

Samsung Galaxy S25 FEMeasureXiaomi 17T
AndroidPlatformAndroid
Exynos 2400 (s5e9945)ChipMT6899
Samsung Xclipse 940GPUMali-G720 MC8
Android 17OSAndroid 17
1Verified benchmark runs1
10 Nov 2026Best run11 Nov 2026

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xiaomi 17T

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store