Android
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Total score
34,132
#4 of 5 on the board · #3 on Android
Six sectionsdashed: the 6,000 reference
Against the referencebest verified run
6,000 points: a Snapdragon 8 Elite phone, as it ships
Strongest: Memory at 1.47× the reference. Weakest: LLM at 0.35×.
- Verified runs
- 1
- Against the reference
- 0.95× of 36,000
- Best run
- 10 Nov 2026
- App version
- 2.0.2
Every test of the best run
The raw measurements behind the score, as the server recorded them.
CPU8,781
Math8,110
- Throughput
- 1,986 ops/s
JSON & XML11,621
- Throughput
- 1,253 ops/s
Compression & crypto8,294
- Throughput
- 802 ops/s
Multi-core7,607
- Throughput
- 6,343 ops/s
Memory8,844
RAM7,397
- Read
- 42.1 GB/s
- Write
- 46.5 GB/s
- Copy
- 19.0 GB/s
- Latency
- 129 ns
Storage6,084
- Sequential read
- 1,618 MB/s
- Sequential write
- 905 MB/s
- Random read (4 KB)
- 42,623 IOPS
- Random write (4 KB)
- 14,973 IOPS
- Reads
- direct I/O
Database15,371
- Insert
- 23,215 tx/s
- Update
- 166,233 tx/s
- Query
- 30,885 /s
GPU4,532
Lake Valley2,939
- Average
- 63.5 fps
- 1% low
- 58.7 fps
Neon City3,928
- Average
- 17.2 fps
- 1% low
- 14.7 fps
Neon City RT6,801
- Average
- 15.2 fps
- 1% low
- 11.7 fps
Everyday UX7,143
Web browsing9,333
- Layout
- 6,612
- Canvas
- 3,359
- CSS
- 1,102
- SVG
- 5,020
- JavaScript
- 3,574 ops/s
Web scrolling76,987
- Speed held
- 854,555 px/s
- Frames dropped
- 0.6 %
Photo gallery9,347
- JPEG
- 204 MP/s
- WebP
- 151 MP/s
- AVIF
- 152 MP/s
Photo editing3,319
- Editing chain
- 220 MP/s
Video playback3,733
- 4K60 H.264
- 185 fps · hardware
- 4K60 HEVC
- 193 fps · hardware
- 4K60 VP9
- 235 fps · hardware
- 4K60 AV1
- 164 fps · hardware
- 8K30 HEVC
- 79.1 fps · hardware
- 8K30 AV1
- not supported
Video export3,501
- 4K60 H.264
- 110 fps · 38.9 dB · hardware
- 4K60 HEVC
- 123 fps · 44.0 dB · hardware
- 4K60 AV1
- no encoder
- 8K30 HEVC
- no encoder
QR scanning2,603
- ZXing
- 244 scans/s
- ML Kit
- 91.3 scans/s
AI2,726
CPU7,069
- Classify
- 370 inferences/s
- Detect
- 18.5 inferences/s
- Segment
- 5.74 inferences/s
- Upscale
- 3.57 inferences/s
- Depth
- 53.5 inferences/s
- Sound
- 3,152 inferences/s
GPU1,110
- Classify
- 132 inferences/s
- Detect
- 15.6 inferences/s
- Segment
- 4.29 inferences/s
- Upscale
- 10.3 inferences/s
- Depth
- 34.5 inferences/s
- Sound
- 437 inferences/s
NPU0
- Runtime
- none ran
- Classify
- —
- Detect
- —
- Segment
- —
- Upscale
- —
- Depth
- —
- Sound
- —
LLM2,106
Prompt (prefill)1,132
- CPU
- 26.4 tok/s
- GPU
- 68.4 tok/s
Reply (decode)3,918
- CPU
- 11.2 tok/s
- GPU
- 6.2 tok/s
Run
- GPU used
- Samsung Xclipse 940
- Free memory at start
- 2.4 GB
No stress run yet. Nobody has submitted a sustained-load run for this device, so we don't know how well it holds its speed.
Compare it
The closest devices on the board, head to head.
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 18% higher overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
vs
Xiaomi 17T23,022
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE scores 48% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
HONOR 600 Pro scores 44% higher overall
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF)134,594
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF) scores 294% higher overall
Have a Samsung Galaxy S25 FE?
Run it yourself and see how your unit compares with this one. Clean runs join the board.