THERMOHAMMER Get the app

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)

Android

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

Exynos 2400 (s5e9945) · Samsung Xclipse 940

34,132total score
VS
Android

Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)

Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) · Mali-G1-Ultra MC12

40,322total score

Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 18% higher overall

Ahead in 4 of 6 sections

Section by sectioneach axis scaled to the better device
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
Section by section: Samsung Galaxy S25 FE against Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)CPU+2.0%MEM+11%GPU+32%UX+41%AI+44%LLM+10%
8,781+2.0% CPUSamsung Galaxy S25 FE leads 8,610

8,110Math7,759

1,986 ops/sThroughput1,900 ops/s

11,621JSON & XML9,949

1,253 ops/sThroughput1,073 ops/s

8,294Compression & crypto7,133

802 ops/sThroughput690 ops/s

7,607Multi-core9,980

6,343 ops/sThroughput8,322 ops/s
8,844 MemoryVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) leads 9,839+11%

7,397RAM8,355

42.1 GB/sRead51.1 GB/s
46.5 GB/sWrite52.6 GB/s
19.0 GB/sCopy27.1 GB/s
129 nsLatency155 ns

6,084Storage6,719

1,618 MB/sSequential read1,708 MB/s
905 MB/sSequential write1,332 MB/s
42,623 IOPSRandom read (4 KB)45,475 IOPS
14,973 IOPSRandom write (4 KB)13,433 IOPS
direct I/OReadsdirect I/O

15,371Database16,968

23,215 tx/sInsert27,449 tx/s
166,233 tx/sUpdate182,899 tx/s
30,885 /sQuery31,932 /s
4,532 GPUVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) leads 5,978+32%

2,939Lake Valley2,765

63.5 fpsAverage59.7 fps
58.7 fps1% low52.4 fps

3,928Neon City4,758

17.2 fpsAverage20.9 fps
14.7 fps1% low17.5 fps

6,801Neon City RT10,680

15.2 fpsAverage23.8 fps
11.7 fps1% low19.6 fps
7,143 Everyday UXVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) leads 10,050+41%

9,333Web browsing6,751

6,612Layout5,290
3,359Canvas2,887
1,102CSS612
5,020SVG2,721
3,574 ops/sJavaScript3,419 ops/s

76,987Web scrolling64,156

854,555 px/sSpeed held712,129 px/s
0.6 %Frames dropped0.0 %

9,347Photo gallery8,428

204 MP/sJPEG140 MP/s
151 MP/sWebP125 MP/s
152 MP/sAVIF186 MP/s

3,319Photo editing4,759

220 MP/sEditing chain315 MP/s

3,733Video playback6,655

185 fps · hardware4K60 H.264320 fps · hardware
193 fps · hardware4K60 HEVC358 fps · hardware
235 fps · hardware4K60 VP9323 fps · hardware
164 fps · hardware4K60 AV1279 fps · hardware
79.1 fps · hardware8K30 HEVC104 fps · hardware
not supported8K30 AV177.3 fps · hardware

3,501Video export11,348

110 fps · 38.9 dB · hardware4K60 H.264225 fps · 40.0 dB · hardware
123 fps · 44.0 dB · hardware4K60 HEVC280 fps · 42.5 dB · hardware
no encoder4K60 AV1no encoder
no encoder8K30 HEVC75.3 fps · 46.7 dB · hardware

2,603QR scanning7,825

244 scans/sZXing733 scans/s
91.3 scans/sML Kit91.4 scans/s
2,726 AIVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) leads 3,933+44%

7,069CPU7,803

370 inferences/sClassify398 inferences/s
18.5 inferences/sDetect25.2 inferences/s
5.74 inferences/sSegment8.24 inferences/s
3.57 inferences/sUpscale3.42 inferences/s
53.5 inferences/sDepth57.6 inferences/s
3,152 inferences/sSound2,305 inferences/s

1,110GPU1,556

132 inferences/sClassify115 inferences/s
15.6 inferences/sDetect25.7 inferences/s
4.29 inferences/sSegment11.0 inferences/s
10.3 inferences/sUpscale32.6 inferences/s
34.5 inferences/sDepth38.8 inferences/s
437 inferences/sSound271 inferences/s

0NPU2,440

none ranRuntimeMediaTek NeuroPilot
—Classify994 inferences/s
—Detect76.5 inferences/s
—Segment91.3 inferences/s
—Upscale252 inferences/s
—Depth369 inferences/s
—Sound1,248 inferences/s
2,106+10% LLMSamsung Galaxy S25 FE leads 1,912

1,132Prompt (prefill)630

26.4 tok/sCPU38.1 tok/s
68.4 tok/sGPU23.1 tok/s

3,918Reply (decode)5,802

11.2 tok/sCPU16.7 tok/s
6.2 tok/sGPU13.6 tok/s

Run

Samsung Xclipse 940GPU usedMali-G1-Ultra MC12
2.4 GBFree memory at start8.3 GB

Open a section for every test. Scores within 1% count as even.

The devices

Samsung Galaxy S25 FEMeasureVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
AndroidPlatformAndroid
Exynos 2400 (s5e9945)ChipDimensity 9500 (MT6993)
Samsung Xclipse 940GPUMali-G1-Ultra MC12
Android 17OSAndroid 17
1Verified benchmark runs1
10 Nov 2026Best run10 Nov 2026

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store