Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 18% higher overall
Ahead in 4 of 6 sections
Section by sectioneach axis scaled to the better device
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
8,781+2.0%
CPUSamsung Galaxy S25 FE leads
8,610
8,110Math7,759
| 1,986 ops/s | Throughput | 1,900 ops/s |
11,621JSON & XML9,949
| 1,253 ops/s | Throughput | 1,073 ops/s |
8,294Compression & crypto7,133
| 802 ops/s | Throughput | 690 ops/s |
7,607Multi-core9,980
| 6,343 ops/s | Throughput | 8,322 ops/s |
8,844
MemoryVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) leads
9,839+11%
7,397RAM8,355
| 42.1 GB/s | Read | 51.1 GB/s |
| 46.5 GB/s | Write | 52.6 GB/s |
| 19.0 GB/s | Copy | 27.1 GB/s |
| 129 ns | Latency | 155 ns |
6,084Storage6,719
| 1,618 MB/s | Sequential read | 1,708 MB/s |
| 905 MB/s | Sequential write | 1,332 MB/s |
| 42,623 IOPS | Random read (4 KB) | 45,475 IOPS |
| 14,973 IOPS | Random write (4 KB) | 13,433 IOPS |
| direct I/O | Reads | direct I/O |
15,371Database16,968
| 23,215 tx/s | Insert | 27,449 tx/s |
| 166,233 tx/s | Update | 182,899 tx/s |
| 30,885 /s | Query | 31,932 /s |
4,532
GPUVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) leads
5,978+32%
2,939Lake Valley2,765
| 63.5 fps | Average | 59.7 fps |
| 58.7 fps | 1% low | 52.4 fps |
3,928Neon City4,758
| 17.2 fps | Average | 20.9 fps |
| 14.7 fps | 1% low | 17.5 fps |
6,801Neon City RT10,680
| 15.2 fps | Average | 23.8 fps |
| 11.7 fps | 1% low | 19.6 fps |
7,143
Everyday UXVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) leads
10,050+41%
9,333Web browsing6,751
| 6,612 | Layout | 5,290 |
| 3,359 | Canvas | 2,887 |
| 1,102 | CSS | 612 |
| 5,020 | SVG | 2,721 |
| 3,574 ops/s | JavaScript | 3,419 ops/s |
76,987Web scrolling64,156
| 854,555 px/s | Speed held | 712,129 px/s |
| 0.6 % | Frames dropped | 0.0 % |
9,347Photo gallery8,428
| 204 MP/s | JPEG | 140 MP/s |
| 151 MP/s | WebP | 125 MP/s |
| 152 MP/s | AVIF | 186 MP/s |
3,319Photo editing4,759
| 220 MP/s | Editing chain | 315 MP/s |
3,733Video playback6,655
| 185 fps · hardware | 4K60 H.264 | 320 fps · hardware |
| 193 fps · hardware | 4K60 HEVC | 358 fps · hardware |
| 235 fps · hardware | 4K60 VP9 | 323 fps · hardware |
| 164 fps · hardware | 4K60 AV1 | 279 fps · hardware |
| 79.1 fps · hardware | 8K30 HEVC | 104 fps · hardware |
| not supported | 8K30 AV1 | 77.3 fps · hardware |
3,501Video export11,348
| 110 fps · 38.9 dB · hardware | 4K60 H.264 | 225 fps · 40.0 dB · hardware |
| 123 fps · 44.0 dB · hardware | 4K60 HEVC | 280 fps · 42.5 dB · hardware |
| no encoder | 4K60 AV1 | no encoder |
| no encoder | 8K30 HEVC | 75.3 fps · 46.7 dB · hardware |
2,603QR scanning7,825
| 244 scans/s | ZXing | 733 scans/s |
| 91.3 scans/s | ML Kit | 91.4 scans/s |
2,726
AIVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) leads
3,933+44%
7,069CPU7,803
| 370 inferences/s | Classify | 398 inferences/s |
| 18.5 inferences/s | Detect | 25.2 inferences/s |
| 5.74 inferences/s | Segment | 8.24 inferences/s |
| 3.57 inferences/s | Upscale | 3.42 inferences/s |
| 53.5 inferences/s | Depth | 57.6 inferences/s |
| 3,152 inferences/s | Sound | 2,305 inferences/s |
1,110GPU1,556
| 132 inferences/s | Classify | 115 inferences/s |
| 15.6 inferences/s | Detect | 25.7 inferences/s |
| 4.29 inferences/s | Segment | 11.0 inferences/s |
| 10.3 inferences/s | Upscale | 32.6 inferences/s |
| 34.5 inferences/s | Depth | 38.8 inferences/s |
| 437 inferences/s | Sound | 271 inferences/s |
0NPU2,440
| none ran | Runtime | MediaTek NeuroPilot |
| — | Classify | 994 inferences/s |
| — | Detect | 76.5 inferences/s |
| — | Segment | 91.3 inferences/s |
| — | Upscale | 252 inferences/s |
| — | Depth | 369 inferences/s |
| — | Sound | 1,248 inferences/s |
2,106+10%
LLMSamsung Galaxy S25 FE leads
1,912
1,132Prompt (prefill)630
| 26.4 tok/s | CPU | 38.1 tok/s |
| 68.4 tok/s | GPU | 23.1 tok/s |
3,918Reply (decode)5,802
| 11.2 tok/s | CPU | 16.7 tok/s |
| 6.2 tok/s | GPU | 13.6 tok/s |
Run
| Samsung Xclipse 940 | GPU used | Mali-G1-Ultra MC12 |
| 2.4 GB | Free memory at start | 8.3 GB |
Open a section for every test. Scores within 1% count as even.
The devices
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | Measure | Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) |
| Android | Platform | Android |
| Exynos 2400 (s5e9945) | Chip | Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) |
| Samsung Xclipse 940 | GPU | Mali-G1-Ultra MC12 |
| Android 17 | OS | Android 17 |
| 1 | Verified benchmark runs | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | Best run | 10 Nov 2026 |
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
More matchups
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
vs
Xiaomi 17T23,022
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE scores 48% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
HONOR 600 Pro scores 44% higher overall
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF)134,594
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF) scores 294% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
HONOR 600 Pro scores 22% higher overall
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
vs
Xiaomi 17T23,022
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 75% higher overall
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF)134,594
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF) scores 234% higher overall
Compare any two devices