THERMOHAMMER Get the app

HONOR 600 Pro vs Xiaomi 17T

Android

HONOR 600 Pro

Snapdragon 8 Elite (SM8750) · Adreno 830

49,080total score
VS
Android

Xiaomi 17T

MT6899 · Mali-G720 MC8

23,022total score

HONOR 600 Pro scores 113% higher overall

Ahead in 6 of 6 sections

Section by sectioneach axis scaled to the better device
HONOR 600 Pro Xiaomi 17T
Section by section: HONOR 600 Pro against Xiaomi 17TCPU+137%MEM+28%GPU+71%UX+96%AI+248%LLM+483%
12,628+137% CPUHONOR 600 Pro leads 5,325

12,685Math4,591

3,106 ops/sThroughput1,124 ops/s

14,586JSON & XML6,688

1,573 ops/sThroughput721 ops/s

12,396Compression & crypto5,711

1,198 ops/sThroughput552 ops/s

11,087Multi-core4,585

9,245 ops/sThroughput3,823 ops/s
8,890+28% MemoryHONOR 600 Pro leads 6,922

7,591RAM5,028

64.6 GB/sRead41.4 GB/s
28.7 GB/sWrite16.7 GB/s
20.0 GB/sCopy16.7 GB/s
116 nsLatency187 ns

5,881Storage7,595

1,797 MB/sSequential read2,982 MB/s
1,491 MB/sSequential write1,667 MB/s
22,051 IOPSRandom read (4 KB)39,603 IOPS
13,819 IOPSRandom write (4 KB)11,531 IOPS
direct I/OReadsdirect I/O

15,739Database8,686

15,839 tx/sInsert16,142 tx/s
184,160 tx/sUpdate82,898 tx/s
43,864 /sQuery16,072 /s
6,247+71% GPUHONOR 600 Pro leads 3,656

5,880Lake Valley2,537

127 fpsAverage54.8 fps
115 fps1% low41.7 fps

6,539Neon City2,978

28.7 fpsAverage13.1 fps
23.2 fps1% low7.7 fps

6,339Neon City RT5,470

14.2 fpsAverage12.2 fps
10.3 fps1% low9.2 fps
7,700+96% Everyday UXHONOR 600 Pro leads 3,938

12,171Web browsing4,123

4,408Layout3,673
5,007Canvas1,720
3,418CSS340
5,388SVG1,470
4,077 ops/sJavaScript2,338 ops/s

5,996Web scrolling4,997

66,558 px/sSpeed held55,465 px/s
3.3 %Frames dropped3.7 %

10,972Photo gallery5,200

245 MP/sJPEG113 MP/s
180 MP/sWebP87.2 MP/s
171 MP/sAVIF81.7 MP/s

5,459Photo editing3,261

361 MP/sEditing chain216 MP/s

6,184Video playback2,707

271 fps · hardware4K60 H.264174 fps · hardware
333 fps · hardware4K60 HEVC195 fps · hardware
318 fps · hardware4K60 VP9184 fps · hardware
274 fps · hardware4K60 AV1164 fps · hardware
90.6 fps · hardware8K30 HEVCnot supported
75.0 fps · hardware8K30 AV1not supported

3,531Video export2,849

118 fps · 41.1 dB · hardware4K60 H.26493.3 fps · 39.3 dB · hardware
118 fps · 30.1 dB · hardware4K60 HEVC96.7 fps · 42.0 dB · hardware
no encoder4K60 AV1no encoder
no encoder8K30 HEVCno encoder

12,954QR scanning5,170

1,214 scans/sZXing485 scans/s
159 scans/sML Kit66.8 scans/s
7,328+248% AIHONOR 600 Pro leads 2,103

10,041CPU4,838

637 inferences/sClassify243 inferences/s
30.1 inferences/sDetect13.5 inferences/s
8.12 inferences/sSegment4.44 inferences/s
4.67 inferences/sUpscale2.51 inferences/s
66.4 inferences/sDepth30.6 inferences/s
4,017 inferences/sSound2,137 inferences/s

5,999GPU1,471

642 inferences/sClassify99.9 inferences/s
87.1 inferences/sDetect23.5 inferences/s
33.7 inferences/sSegment10.8 inferences/s
87.7 inferences/sUpscale27.8 inferences/s
183 inferences/sDepth53.2 inferences/s
1,525 inferences/sSound184 inferences/s

5,945NPU0

Qualcomm QNNRuntimenone ran
1,721 inferences/sClassify—
492 inferences/sDetect—
221 inferences/sSegment—
698 inferences/sUpscale—
999 inferences/sDepth—
2,131 inferences/sSound—
6,287+483% LLMHONOR 600 Pro leads 1,078

5,219Prompt (prefill)294

37.3 tok/sCPU17.8 tok/s
315 tok/sGPU5.0 tok/s

7,574Reply (decode)3,956

21.0 tok/sCPU11.4 tok/s
21.8 tok/sGPU6.9 tok/s

Run

QUALCOMM Adreno(TM) 830GPU usedMali-G720 MC8
5.9 GBFree memory at start5.3 GB

Open a section for every test. Scores within 1% count as even.

The devices

HONOR 600 ProMeasureXiaomi 17T
AndroidPlatformAndroid
Snapdragon 8 Elite (SM8750)ChipMT6899
Adreno 830GPUMali-G720 MC8
Android 17OSAndroid 17
3Verified benchmark runs1
10 Nov 2026Best run11 Nov 2026

HONOR 600 Pro Xiaomi 17T

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store