HONOR 600 Pro vs Xiaomi 17T
Android
HONOR 600 Pro
Snapdragon 8 Elite (SM8750) · Adreno 830
49,080total scoreVS
Android
Xiaomi 17T
MT6899 · Mali-G720 MC8
23,022total scoreHONOR 600 Pro scores 113% higher overall
Ahead in 6 of 6 sections
Section by sectioneach axis scaled to the better device
HONOR 600 Pro
Xiaomi 17T
12,628+137% CPUHONOR 600 Pro leads 5,325
12,685Math4,591
| 3,106 ops/s | Throughput | 1,124 ops/s |
14,586JSON & XML6,688
| 1,573 ops/s | Throughput | 721 ops/s |
12,396Compression & crypto5,711
| 1,198 ops/s | Throughput | 552 ops/s |
11,087Multi-core4,585
| 9,245 ops/s | Throughput | 3,823 ops/s |
8,890+28% MemoryHONOR 600 Pro leads 6,922
7,591RAM5,028
| 64.6 GB/s | Read | 41.4 GB/s |
| 28.7 GB/s | Write | 16.7 GB/s |
| 20.0 GB/s | Copy | 16.7 GB/s |
| 116 ns | Latency | 187 ns |
5,881Storage7,595
| 1,797 MB/s | Sequential read | 2,982 MB/s |
| 1,491 MB/s | Sequential write | 1,667 MB/s |
| 22,051 IOPS | Random read (4 KB) | 39,603 IOPS |
| 13,819 IOPS | Random write (4 KB) | 11,531 IOPS |
| direct I/O | Reads | direct I/O |
15,739Database8,686
| 15,839 tx/s | Insert | 16,142 tx/s |
| 184,160 tx/s | Update | 82,898 tx/s |
| 43,864 /s | Query | 16,072 /s |
6,247+71% GPUHONOR 600 Pro leads 3,656
5,880Lake Valley2,537
| 127 fps | Average | 54.8 fps |
| 115 fps | 1% low | 41.7 fps |
6,539Neon City2,978
| 28.7 fps | Average | 13.1 fps |
| 23.2 fps | 1% low | 7.7 fps |
6,339Neon City RT5,470
| 14.2 fps | Average | 12.2 fps |
| 10.3 fps | 1% low | 9.2 fps |
7,700+96% Everyday UXHONOR 600 Pro leads 3,938
12,171Web browsing4,123
| 4,408 | Layout | 3,673 |
| 5,007 | Canvas | 1,720 |
| 3,418 | CSS | 340 |
| 5,388 | SVG | 1,470 |
| 4,077 ops/s | JavaScript | 2,338 ops/s |
5,996Web scrolling4,997
| 66,558 px/s | Speed held | 55,465 px/s |
| 3.3 % | Frames dropped | 3.7 % |
10,972Photo gallery5,200
| 245 MP/s | JPEG | 113 MP/s |
| 180 MP/s | WebP | 87.2 MP/s |
| 171 MP/s | AVIF | 81.7 MP/s |
5,459Photo editing3,261
| 361 MP/s | Editing chain | 216 MP/s |
6,184Video playback2,707
| 271 fps · hardware | 4K60 H.264 | 174 fps · hardware |
| 333 fps · hardware | 4K60 HEVC | 195 fps · hardware |
| 318 fps · hardware | 4K60 VP9 | 184 fps · hardware |
| 274 fps · hardware | 4K60 AV1 | 164 fps · hardware |
| 90.6 fps · hardware | 8K30 HEVC | not supported |
| 75.0 fps · hardware | 8K30 AV1 | not supported |
3,531Video export2,849
| 118 fps · 41.1 dB · hardware | 4K60 H.264 | 93.3 fps · 39.3 dB · hardware |
| 118 fps · 30.1 dB · hardware | 4K60 HEVC | 96.7 fps · 42.0 dB · hardware |
| no encoder | 4K60 AV1 | no encoder |
| no encoder | 8K30 HEVC | no encoder |
12,954QR scanning5,170
| 1,214 scans/s | ZXing | 485 scans/s |
| 159 scans/s | ML Kit | 66.8 scans/s |
7,328+248% AIHONOR 600 Pro leads 2,103
10,041CPU4,838
| 637 inferences/s | Classify | 243 inferences/s |
| 30.1 inferences/s | Detect | 13.5 inferences/s |
| 8.12 inferences/s | Segment | 4.44 inferences/s |
| 4.67 inferences/s | Upscale | 2.51 inferences/s |
| 66.4 inferences/s | Depth | 30.6 inferences/s |
| 4,017 inferences/s | Sound | 2,137 inferences/s |
5,999GPU1,471
| 642 inferences/s | Classify | 99.9 inferences/s |
| 87.1 inferences/s | Detect | 23.5 inferences/s |
| 33.7 inferences/s | Segment | 10.8 inferences/s |
| 87.7 inferences/s | Upscale | 27.8 inferences/s |
| 183 inferences/s | Depth | 53.2 inferences/s |
| 1,525 inferences/s | Sound | 184 inferences/s |
5,945NPU0
| Qualcomm QNN | Runtime | none ran |
| 1,721 inferences/s | Classify | — |
| 492 inferences/s | Detect | — |
| 221 inferences/s | Segment | — |
| 698 inferences/s | Upscale | — |
| 999 inferences/s | Depth | — |
| 2,131 inferences/s | Sound | — |
6,287+483% LLMHONOR 600 Pro leads 1,078
5,219Prompt (prefill)294
| 37.3 tok/s | CPU | 17.8 tok/s |
| 315 tok/s | GPU | 5.0 tok/s |
7,574Reply (decode)3,956
| 21.0 tok/s | CPU | 11.4 tok/s |
| 21.8 tok/s | GPU | 6.9 tok/s |
Run
| QUALCOMM Adreno(TM) 830 | GPU used | Mali-G720 MC8 |
| 5.9 GB | Free memory at start | 5.3 GB |
Open a section for every test. Scores within 1% count as even.
The devices
| HONOR 600 Pro | Measure | Xiaomi 17T |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | Android |
| Snapdragon 8 Elite (SM8750) | Chip | MT6899 |
| Adreno 830 | GPU | Mali-G720 MC8 |
| Android 17 | OS | Android 17 |
| 3 | Verified benchmark runs | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | Best run | 11 Nov 2026 |
More matchups
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
HONOR 600 Pro scores 22% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
HONOR 600 Pro scores 44% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF)134,594
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF) scores 174% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro56.4%
vs
iPhone 11 Pro55.7%
HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
HONOR 600 Pro56.4%
vs
HONOR 9049.2%
HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
HONOR 600 Pro56.4%
Google Pixel 9 holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.