Android
HONOR 600 Pro
Total score
49,080
#2 of 5 on the board · #1 on Android
Six sectionsdashed: the 6,000 reference
Against the referencebest verified run
6,000 points: a Snapdragon 8 Elite phone, as it ships
Strongest: CPU at 2.1× the reference. Weakest: GPU at 1.04×.
- Verified runs
- 3
- Median of its runs
- 36,539
- Best over median
- +34%
- Against the reference
- 1.36× of 36,000
- Best run
- 10 Nov 2026
- App version
- 2.0.4
Every test of the best run
The raw measurements behind the score, as the server recorded them.
CPU12,628
Math12,685
- Throughput
- 3,106 ops/s
JSON & XML14,586
- Throughput
- 1,573 ops/s
Compression & crypto12,396
- Throughput
- 1,198 ops/s
Multi-core11,087
- Throughput
- 9,245 ops/s
Memory8,890
RAM7,591
- Read
- 64.6 GB/s
- Write
- 28.7 GB/s
- Copy
- 20.0 GB/s
- Latency
- 116 ns
Storage5,881
- Sequential read
- 1,797 MB/s
- Sequential write
- 1,491 MB/s
- Random read (4 KB)
- 22,051 IOPS
- Random write (4 KB)
- 13,819 IOPS
- Reads
- direct I/O
Database15,739
- Insert
- 15,839 tx/s
- Update
- 184,160 tx/s
- Query
- 43,864 /s
GPU6,247
Lake Valley5,880
- Average
- 127 fps
- 1% low
- 115 fps
Neon City6,539
- Average
- 28.7 fps
- 1% low
- 23.2 fps
Neon City RT6,339
- Average
- 14.2 fps
- 1% low
- 10.3 fps
Everyday UX7,700
Web browsing12,171
- Layout
- 4,408
- Canvas
- 5,007
- CSS
- 3,418
- SVG
- 5,388
- JavaScript
- 4,077 ops/s
Web scrolling5,996
- Speed held
- 66,558 px/s
- Frames dropped
- 3.3 %
Photo gallery10,972
- JPEG
- 245 MP/s
- WebP
- 180 MP/s
- AVIF
- 171 MP/s
Photo editing5,459
- Editing chain
- 361 MP/s
Video playback6,184
- 4K60 H.264
- 271 fps · hardware
- 4K60 HEVC
- 333 fps · hardware
- 4K60 VP9
- 318 fps · hardware
- 4K60 AV1
- 274 fps · hardware
- 8K30 HEVC
- 90.6 fps · hardware
- 8K30 AV1
- 75.0 fps · hardware
Video export3,531
- 4K60 H.264
- 118 fps · 41.1 dB · hardware
- 4K60 HEVC
- 118 fps · 30.1 dB · hardware
- 4K60 AV1
- no encoder
- 8K30 HEVC
- no encoder
QR scanning12,954
- ZXing
- 1,214 scans/s
- ML Kit
- 159 scans/s
AI7,328
CPU10,041
- Classify
- 637 inferences/s
- Detect
- 30.1 inferences/s
- Segment
- 8.12 inferences/s
- Upscale
- 4.67 inferences/s
- Depth
- 66.4 inferences/s
- Sound
- 4,017 inferences/s
GPU5,999
- Classify
- 642 inferences/s
- Detect
- 87.1 inferences/s
- Segment
- 33.7 inferences/s
- Upscale
- 87.7 inferences/s
- Depth
- 183 inferences/s
- Sound
- 1,525 inferences/s
NPU5,945
- Runtime
- Qualcomm QNN
- Classify
- 1,721 inferences/s
- Detect
- 492 inferences/s
- Segment
- 221 inferences/s
- Upscale
- 698 inferences/s
- Depth
- 999 inferences/s
- Sound
- 2,131 inferences/s
LLM6,287
Prompt (prefill)5,219
- CPU
- 37.3 tok/s
- GPU
- 315 tok/s
Reply (decode)7,574
- CPU
- 21.0 tok/s
- GPU
- 21.8 tok/s
Run
- GPU used
- QUALCOMM Adreno(TM) 830
- Free memory at start
- 5.9 GB
All verified runs
The board keeps the best one. The others show how much this device moves from run to run.
| Run | Date | App | OS | CPU | MEM | GPU | UX | AI | LLM | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #5 best | 10 Nov 2026 | 2.0.4 | 17 | 12,628 | 8,890 | 6,247 | 7,700 | 7,328 | 6,287 | 49,080 |
| #4 | 10 Nov 2026 | 2.0.4 | 17 | 6,082 | 6,059 | 5,948 | 5,590 | 6,109 | 6,751 | 36,539 |
| #2 | 9 Nov 2026 | 2.0.1-bench | 17 | 6,026 | 6,039 | 6,014 | 5,302 | 6,096 | 5,909 | 35,386 |
Under sustained load
HONOR 600 Pro holds 56.4% of its peak speed through a 5-minute stress test on every core. That is #32 of 34 devices on the same test.
Throughput ribbonrun #1039 · Android 16
- Held
- 56.4% of full speed
- Peak
- 1.65 GIPS
- Second half
- 0.93 GIPS
- Test
- 5 min every core
- Fastest sample
- 1.65 GIPS
- Second-half average
- 0.93 GIPS
- Lowest 5-second average
- 44%
- First under 90%
- 0:05 into the run
- Hottest state reported
- Fair
- Samples
- 298
All 2 stress runsbest first
| Run | Test | OS | Curve | Peak GIPS | Second half | Stability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1039 | 5 min · multi-thread | 16 | 1.65 | 0.93 | 56.4% | |
| #1060 | 5 min · multi-thread | 16 | 1.11 | 0.54 | 48.2% |
Compare it
The closest devices on the board, head to head.
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
HONOR 600 Pro scores 22% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
HONOR 600 Pro scores 44% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Xiaomi 17T23,022
HONOR 600 Pro scores 113% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF)134,594
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF) scores 174% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro56.4%
vs
iPhone 11 Pro55.7%
HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
HONOR 600 Pro56.4%
vs
HONOR 9049.2%
HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
HONOR 600 Pro56.4%
Google Pixel 9 holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 572.5%
vs
HONOR 600 Pro56.4%
Google Pixel 5 holds its speed better under sustained load
HONOR 600 Pro56.4%
vs
iPhone 16e73.5%
iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load
Have a HONOR 600 Pro?
Run it yourself and see how your unit compares with this one. Clean runs join the board.