iPhone 16e vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
iOS
iPhone 16e
73.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) · Mali-G1-Ultra MC12
69.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadiPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load
73.5% against 69.2% of full speed
Under sustained load
iPhone 16e keeps 73.5% of its speed, Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) 69.2%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone 16e | Measure | Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 2.00 GIPS | Fastest sample | 1.44 GIPS |
| 1.47 GIPS | Second-half average | 1.08 GIPS |
| 72% | Lowest 5-second average | 63% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Serious |
The devices
| iPhone 16e | Measure | Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) |
| – | GPU | Mali-G1-Ultra MC12 |
| iOS 26.6.1 | OS | Android 17 |
More matchups
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 572.5%
vs
iPhone 16e73.5%
iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 1577.3%
vs
iPhone 16e73.5%
iPhone 15 holds its speed better under sustained load
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 18% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
HONOR 600 Pro scores 22% higher overall
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.