HONOR 90 vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
Android
HONOR 90
49.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
7.5%speed held · 5 min · 1 threadHONOR 90 holds its speed better under sustained load
49.2% against 7.5% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
HONOR 90 keeps 49.2% of its speed, Nothing Phone (3a) Lite 7.5%. The runs used different settings (5 min · multi-thread against 5 min · 1 thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| HONOR 90 | Measure | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · 1 thread |
| 4.32 GIPS | Fastest sample | 2.86 GIPS |
| 2.12 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.21 GIPS |
| 39% | Lowest 5-second average | 3% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Serious |
The devices
| HONOR 90 | Measure | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| Android 15 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
HONOR 9049.2%
vs
iPhone 11 Pro55.7%
iPhone 11 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
HONOR 600 Pro56.4%
vs
HONOR 9049.2%
HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
HONOR 9049.2%
Google Pixel 9 holds its speed better under sustained load
HONOR 9049.2%
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2%
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.