THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPad (A16) vs iPhone 16e

iOS

iPad (A16)

85.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
iOS

iPhone 16e

73.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

iPad (A16) holds its speed better under sustained load

85.4% against 73.5% of full speed

Under sustained load

iPad (A16) keeps 85.4% of its speed, iPhone 16e 73.5%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPad (A16) 85.4% iPhone 16e 73.5%
Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against iPhone 16e25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against iPhone 16e25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPad (A16)MeasureiPhone 16e
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.61 GIPSFastest sample2.00 GIPS
1.38 GIPSSecond-half average1.47 GIPS
82%Lowest 5-second average72%
NominalHottest state reportedFair

The devices

iPad (A16)MeasureiPhone 16e
iOSPlatformiOS
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.6OSiOS 26.6.1

iPad (A16) iPhone 16e

More matchups

iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPad (A16)85.4% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 16e73.5% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 572.5% vs iPhone 16e73.5% iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store