THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPad (A16) vs OPPO A53

iOS

iPad (A16)

85.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

OPPO A53

89.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load

85.4% against 89.9% of full speed

Under sustained load

OPPO A53 keeps 89.9% of its speed, iPad (A16) 85.4%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPad (A16) 85.4% OPPO A53 89.9%
Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against OPPO A5325%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against OPPO A5325%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPad (A16)MeasureOPPO A53
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.61 GIPSFastest sample0.60 GIPS
1.38 GIPSSecond-half average0.57 GIPS
82%Lowest 5-second average82%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPad (A16)MeasureOPPO A53
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.6OSAndroid 12

iPad (A16) OPPO A53

More matchups

iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPad (A16)85.4% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 1291.0% vs OPPO A5389.9% iPhone 12 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OPPO A5389.9% OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store