iPad mini (6th generation) vs OPPO A53
iOS
iPad mini (6th generation)
88.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
OPPO A53
89.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadOPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load
88.4% against 89.9% of full speed
Under sustained load
OPPO A53 keeps 89.9% of its speed, iPad mini (6th generation) 88.4%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPad mini (6th generation) | Measure | OPPO A53 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 1.67 GIPS | Fastest sample | 0.60 GIPS |
| 1.53 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.57 GIPS |
| 77% | Lowest 5-second average | 82% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| iPad mini (6th generation) | Measure | OPPO A53 |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 27.2 | OS | Android 12 |
More matchups
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OBLUE A10187.6%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2%
iPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 1291.0%
vs
OPPO A5389.9%
iPhone 12 holds its speed better under sustained load
OPPO A5389.9%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load
OBLUE A10187.6%
vs
OPPO A5389.9%
OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.