THERMOHAMMER Get the app

OPPO A53 vs Xiaomi Pad 6

Android

OPPO A53

89.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load

89.9% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

OPPO A53 keeps 89.9% of its speed, Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
OPPO A53 89.9% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: OPPO A53 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: OPPO A53 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
OPPO A53MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
0.60 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
0.57 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
82%Lowest 5-second average81%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

OPPO A53MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
AndroidPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 12OSAndroid 14

OPPO A53 Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

iPhone 1291.0% vs OPPO A5389.9% iPhone 12 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OPPO A5389.9% OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load OBLUE A10187.6% vs OPPO A5389.9% OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store