THERMOHAMMER Get the app

OBLUE A101 vs Xiaomi Pad 6

Android

OBLUE A101

87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

87.6% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

Both hold their speed about equally: 87.6% and 88.2%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
OBLUE A101 87.6% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: OBLUE A101 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: OBLUE A101 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
OBLUE A101MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
2.43 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
2.11 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
80%Lowest 5-second average81%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

OBLUE A101MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
AndroidPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 16OSAndroid 14

OBLUE A101 Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OBLUE A10187.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% vs OBLUE A10187.6% OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 16 Pro85.5% vs OBLUE A10187.6% OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OPPO A5389.9% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store