THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 16 Pro vs OBLUE A101

iOS

iPhone 16 Pro

85.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

OBLUE A101

87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load

85.5% against 87.6% of full speed

Under sustained load

OBLUE A101 keeps 87.6% of its speed, iPhone 16 Pro 85.5%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 16 Pro 85.5% OBLUE A101 87.6%
Throughput over time: iPhone 16 Pro against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 16 Pro against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 16 ProMeasureOBLUE A101
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
2.23 GIPSFastest sample2.43 GIPS
1.91 GIPSSecond-half average2.11 GIPS
80%Lowest 5-second average80%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 16 ProMeasureOBLUE A101
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 27.0OSAndroid 16

iPhone 16 Pro OBLUE A101

More matchups

iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% iPhone 16 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OBLUE A10187.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store