THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPad mini (6th generation) vs OBLUE A101

iOS

iPad mini (6th generation)

88.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

OBLUE A101

87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

88.4% against 87.6% of full speed

Under sustained load

Both hold their speed about equally: 88.4% and 87.6%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPad mini (6th generation) 88.4% OBLUE A101 87.6%
Throughput over time: iPad mini (6th generation) against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:005:00Throughput over time: iPad mini (6th generation) against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:005:00
iPad mini (6th generation)MeasureOBLUE A101
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.67 GIPSFastest sample2.43 GIPS
1.53 GIPSSecond-half average2.11 GIPS
77%Lowest 5-second average80%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPad mini (6th generation)MeasureOBLUE A101
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 27.2OSAndroid 16

iPad mini (6th generation) OBLUE A101

More matchups

iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OPPO A5389.9% OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% iPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% vs OBLUE A10187.6% OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 16 Pro85.5% vs OBLUE A10187.6% OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store