THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPad mini (6th generation) vs Xiaomi Pad 6

iOS

iPad mini (6th generation)

88.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

88.4% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

Both hold their speed about equally: 88.4% and 88.2%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPad mini (6th generation) 88.4% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: iPad mini (6th generation) against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:005:00Throughput over time: iPad mini (6th generation) against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:005:00
iPad mini (6th generation)MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.67 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
1.53 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
77%Lowest 5-second average81%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPad mini (6th generation)MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 27.2OSAndroid 14

iPad mini (6th generation) Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OBLUE A10187.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OPPO A5389.9% OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% iPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OPPO A5389.9% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store