THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 13 Pro Max vs Xiaomi Pad 6

iOS

iPhone 13 Pro Max

86.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

86.2% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, iPhone 13 Pro Max 86.2%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 13 Pro Max 86.2% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: iPhone 13 Pro Max against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 13 Pro Max against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 13 Pro MaxMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.54 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
1.33 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
72%Lowest 5-second average81%
SeriousHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 13 Pro MaxMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.7OSAndroid 14

iPhone 13 Pro Max Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% iPhone 13 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% vs OBLUE A10187.6% OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store