THERMOHAMMER Get the app

OBLUE A101 vs OPPO A53

Android

OBLUE A101

87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

OPPO A53

89.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load

87.6% against 89.9% of full speed

Under sustained load

OPPO A53 keeps 89.9% of its speed, OBLUE A101 87.6%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
OBLUE A101 87.6% OPPO A53 89.9%
Throughput over time: OBLUE A101 against OPPO A5325%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: OBLUE A101 against OPPO A5325%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
OBLUE A101MeasureOPPO A53
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
2.43 GIPSFastest sample0.60 GIPS
2.11 GIPSSecond-half average0.57 GIPS
80%Lowest 5-second average82%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

OBLUE A101MeasureOPPO A53
AndroidPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 16OSAndroid 12

OBLUE A101 OPPO A53

More matchups

OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OBLUE A10187.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% vs OBLUE A10187.6% OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 16 Pro85.5% vs OBLUE A10187.6% OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1291.0% vs OPPO A5389.9% iPhone 12 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OPPO A5389.9% OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store