THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 16 Pro vs OPPO A53

iOS

iPhone 16 Pro

85.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

OPPO A53

89.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load

85.5% against 89.9% of full speed

Under sustained load

OPPO A53 keeps 89.9% of its speed, iPhone 16 Pro 85.5%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 16 Pro 85.5% OPPO A53 89.9%
Throughput over time: iPhone 16 Pro against OPPO A5325%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 16 Pro against OPPO A5325%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 16 ProMeasureOPPO A53
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
2.23 GIPSFastest sample0.60 GIPS
1.91 GIPSSecond-half average0.57 GIPS
80%Lowest 5-second average82%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 16 ProMeasureOPPO A53
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 27.0OSAndroid 12

iPhone 16 Pro OPPO A53

More matchups

iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% iPhone 16 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1291.0% vs OPPO A5389.9% iPhone 12 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OPPO A5389.9% OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store