THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 16 vs OPPO A53

iOS

iPhone 16

79.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

OPPO A53

89.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load

79.9% against 89.9% of full speed

Under sustained load

OPPO A53 keeps 89.9% of its speed, iPhone 16 79.9%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 16 79.9% OPPO A53 89.9%
Throughput over time: iPhone 16 against OPPO A5325%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 16 against OPPO A5325%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 16MeasureOPPO A53
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
2.17 GIPSFastest sample0.60 GIPS
1.73 GIPSSecond-half average0.57 GIPS
79%Lowest 5-second average82%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 16MeasureOPPO A53
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 27.0OSAndroid 12

iPhone 16 OPPO A53

More matchups

iPhone 1679.9% vs iPhone XR79.8% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 1480.1% vs iPhone 1679.9% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 14 Pro Max80.8% vs iPhone 1679.9% iPhone 14 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation)80.9% vs iPhone 1679.9% iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1291.0% vs OPPO A5389.9% iPhone 12 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OPPO A5389.9% OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store