motorola edge 60 vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
Android
motorola edge 60
95.1%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
7.5%speed held · 5 min · 1 threadmotorola edge 60 holds its speed better under sustained load
95.1% against 7.5% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
motorola edge 60 keeps 95.1% of its speed, Nothing Phone (3a) Lite 7.5%. The runs used different settings (5 min · multi-thread against 5 min · 1 thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| motorola edge 60 | Measure | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · 1 thread |
| 4.42 GIPS | Fastest sample | 2.86 GIPS |
| 4.20 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.21 GIPS |
| 92% | Lowest 5-second average | 3% |
| Nominal | Hottest state reported | Serious |
The devices
| motorola edge 60 | Measure | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| Android 16 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
iPhone 1394.7%
vs
motorola edge 6095.1%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 1291.0%
vs
motorola edge 6095.1%
motorola edge 60 holds its speed better under sustained load
motorola edge 6095.1%
vs
OPPO A5389.9%
motorola edge 60 holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
motorola edge 6095.1%
motorola edge 60 holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.