motorola edge 60 vs OPPO A53
Android
motorola edge 60
95.1%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
OPPO A53
89.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadmotorola edge 60 holds its speed better under sustained load
95.1% against 89.9% of full speed
Under sustained load
motorola edge 60 keeps 95.1% of its speed, OPPO A53 89.9%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| motorola edge 60 | Measure | OPPO A53 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 4.42 GIPS | Fastest sample | 0.60 GIPS |
| 4.20 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.57 GIPS |
| 92% | Lowest 5-second average | 82% |
| Nominal | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| motorola edge 60 | Measure | OPPO A53 |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| Android 16 | OS | Android 12 |
More matchups
iPhone 1394.7%
vs
motorola edge 6095.1%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 1291.0%
vs
motorola edge 6095.1%
motorola edge 60 holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
motorola edge 6095.1%
motorola edge 60 holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 1291.0%
vs
OPPO A5389.9%
iPhone 12 holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OPPO A5389.9%
OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load
OPPO A5389.9%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.