Nothing Phone (3a) Lite vs OPPO A53

Android

Nothing Phone (3a) Lite

7.5%speed held · 5 min · 1 thread

Android

OPPO A53

89.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load

7.5% against 89.9% of full speed · different test settings, see below

Under sustained load

OPPO A53 keeps 89.9% of its speed, Nothing Phone (3a) Lite 7.5%. The runs used different settings (5 min · 1 thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time

Nothing Phone (3a) Lite 7.5% OPPO A53 89.9%

Nothing Phone (3a) Lite	Measure	OPPO A53
5 min · 1 thread	Test	5 min · multi-thread
2.86 GIPS	Fastest sample	0.60 GIPS
0.21 GIPS	Second-half average	0.57 GIPS
3%	Lowest 5-second average	82%
Serious	Hottest state reported	Nominal

The devices

Nothing Phone (3a) Lite	Measure	OPPO A53
Android	Platform	Android
–	Chip	–
–	GPU	–
Android 16	OS	Android 12

Nothing Phone (3a) Lite OPPO A53

More matchups

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5% vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5% Google Pixel 9 Pro XL holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 13 mini73.0% vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5% iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7% vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5% iPhone 17 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load iPad (9th generation)76.9% vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5% iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1291.0% vs OPPO A5389.9% iPhone 12 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OPPO A5389.9% OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store