Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
Android
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
33.5%speed held · 30 min · 1 threadVS
Android
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) · Mali-G1-Ultra MC12
69.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) holds its speed better under sustained load
33.5% against 69.2% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) keeps 69.2% of its speed, Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 33.5%. The runs used different settings (30 min · 1 thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Measure | Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| 30 min · 1 thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 0.51 GIPS | Fastest sample | 1.44 GIPS |
| 0.15 GIPS | Second-half average | 1.08 GIPS |
| 18% | Lowest 5-second average | 63% |
| Serious | Hottest state reported | Serious |
The devices
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Measure | Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) |
| – | GPU | Mali-G1-Ultra MC12 |
| Android 17 | OS | Android 17 |
More matchups
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
iPhone 17 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 18% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
HONOR 600 Pro scores 22% higher overall
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.