Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Xiaomi Pad 6
Android
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
33.5%speed held · 30 min · 1 threadVS
Android
Xiaomi Pad 6
88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadXiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load
33.5% against 88.2% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 33.5%. The runs used different settings (30 min · 1 thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Measure | Xiaomi Pad 6 |
|---|---|---|
| 30 min · 1 thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 0.51 GIPS | Fastest sample | 0.70 GIPS |
| 0.15 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.62 GIPS |
| 18% | Lowest 5-second average | 81% |
| Serious | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Measure | Xiaomi Pad 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| Android 17 | OS | Android 14 |
More matchups
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
iPhone 17 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
OBLUE A10187.6%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.