THERMOHAMMER Get the app

HONOR 90 vs iPhone 16e

Android

HONOR 90

49.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
iOS

iPhone 16e

73.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load

49.2% against 73.5% of full speed

Under sustained load

iPhone 16e keeps 73.5% of its speed, HONOR 90 49.2%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
HONOR 90 49.2% iPhone 16e 73.5%
Throughput over time: HONOR 90 against iPhone 16e25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: HONOR 90 against iPhone 16e25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
HONOR 90MeasureiPhone 16e
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
4.32 GIPSFastest sample2.00 GIPS
2.12 GIPSSecond-half average1.47 GIPS
39%Lowest 5-second average72%
FairHottest state reportedFair

The devices

HONOR 90MeasureiPhone 16e
AndroidPlatformiOS
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 15OSiOS 26.6.1

HONOR 90 iPhone 16e

More matchups

HONOR 9049.2% vs iPhone 11 Pro55.7% iPhone 11 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load HONOR 600 Pro56.4% vs HONOR 9049.2% HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 968.6% vs HONOR 9049.2% Google Pixel 9 holds its speed better under sustained load HONOR 9049.2% vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2% Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 16e73.5% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 572.5% vs iPhone 16e73.5% iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store