HONOR 90 vs OPPO A53
Android
HONOR 90
49.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
OPPO A53
89.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadOPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load
49.2% against 89.9% of full speed
Under sustained load
OPPO A53 keeps 89.9% of its speed, HONOR 90 49.2%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| HONOR 90 | Measure | OPPO A53 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 4.32 GIPS | Fastest sample | 0.60 GIPS |
| 2.12 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.57 GIPS |
| 39% | Lowest 5-second average | 82% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| HONOR 90 | Measure | OPPO A53 |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| Android 15 | OS | Android 12 |
More matchups
HONOR 9049.2%
vs
iPhone 11 Pro55.7%
iPhone 11 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
HONOR 600 Pro56.4%
vs
HONOR 9049.2%
HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
HONOR 9049.2%
Google Pixel 9 holds its speed better under sustained load
HONOR 9049.2%
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2%
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 1291.0%
vs
OPPO A5389.9%
iPhone 12 holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OPPO A5389.9%
OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.